– James Lovelock, again, tells it like it is. What he says here is what I’ve felt for a long time without being able to articulate it nearly so well as he has. Indeed, it is why I’ve secured the right of permanent residency in New Zealand; as a hedge against the future he’s painting.
– I see people drawing word pictures of the world around us at all levels. Â The local and the mundane, the national and the global. Â But most of their pictures are fragments at best; partial renderings of realities far more complex and dark than they’ve drawn or imagined.
– Lovelock paints the canvas behind all their canvases.  They are, perhaps, the projected moving pictures on the screen. Whereas, his is the screen upon which theirs cavort. In rings speak, ‘One vision to rule them all’.
– There are big changes, nearly unimaginably big changes, coming.  And most of us, if we are not in denial, are engaged in building sandcastles in a losing battle to stem the sea.  His analogies about 1939 are so apt.  And time is getting so late.
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Last week she played in the snow, but what will Britain be like when she grows up? James Lovelock, the Earth guru, foresees a land where blizzards are long forgotten and national survival depends on a new Winston Churchill
When someone discovers, too late, that they are suffering from a serious and probably incurable disease and may have no more than six months to live, their first response is shock and then, in denial, they angrily try any cure on offer or go to practitioners of alternative medicine. Finally, if wise, they reach a state of calm acceptance. They know death need not be feared and that no one escapes it.
Scientists who recognise the truth about the Earth’s condition advise their governments of its deadly seriousness in the manner of a physician. We are now seeing the responses. First was denial at all levels, then the desperate search for a cure. Just as we as individuals try alternative medicine, so our governments have many offers from alternative business and their lobbies of sustainable ways to “save the planet”, and from some green hospice there may come the anodyne of hope.
Should you doubt that this grim prospect is real, let me remind you of the forces now taking the Earth to the hothouse: these include the increasing abundance of greenhouse gases from industry and agriculture, including gases from natural ecosystems damaged by global heating in the Arctic and the tropics. The vast ocean ecosystems that used to pump down carbon dioxide can no longer do so because the ocean turns to desert as it warms and grows more acidic; then there is the extra absorption of the sun’s radiant heat as white reflecting snow melts and is replaced by dark ground or ocean.
Each separate increase adds heat and together they amplify the warming that we cause. The power of this combination and the inability of the Earth now to resist it is what forces me to see the efforts made to stabilise carbon dioxide and temperature as no better than planetary alternative medicine.
Do not be misled by lulls in climate change when global temperature is constant for a few years or even, as we have seen in the UK in the past week, appears to drop and people ask: where is global warming now?
However unlikely it sometimes seems, change really is happening and the Earth grows warmer year by year. But do not expect the climate to follow the smooth path of slowly but sedately rising temperatures predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), where change slowly inches up and leaves plenty of time for business as usual. The real Earth changes by fits and starts, with spells of constancy, even slight decline, between the jumps to greater heat. It is ever more at risk of changing to a barren state in which few of us can survive.
The high-sounding and well-meaning visions of the European Union of “saving the planet” and developing sustainably by using only “natural” energy might have worked in 1800 when there were only a billion of us, but now they are a wholly impractical luxury we can ill afford.
More… ➡
– research thanks, again, to Robin S.
Tags: Gaia, James Lovelock
>that democracy had temporarily to be suspended and we had to accept a… duration of the survival emergency.
doesn’t one of your other posts say that the emergency will last forever? That co2 is like nuclear toxic waste?
what do you think about Cryptogon’s thesis that this is all a scam to increase centralized control and profit?
Isn’t the upshot of lovelock’s piece really that billions of humans need to die ASAP? Google “useless eaters” to discover more about this interesting elite POV.
Bruce,
I see that parts of all this are true.
I believe that the elites have always pushed wars as being good for profits – hence I agree with Cryptogon’s point. I think they are always around subverting the game as they find it on any given day. But, I don’t think they are ‘big picture’ manipulators with long time-views. That the global ecology is going off a cliff doesn’t concern them as a central issue. They are focused on controlling what ever is happening from a profit & power POV.
Regarding the ‘useless eaters’ concept (thanks for the link), yes, there are too many people for humanity’s relationship with the biosphere to be sustainable. It presents us with a profound moral and ethical conundrum.
I just read a book by Bruce Sterling called “Heavy Weather” in which he posits a group of very rich and powerful folks who see the problem and who’ve decided to act to eliminate large sections of the population knowing full-well that their actions are both necessary and deeply reprehensible.
I think there are multiple conundrums like this lying about in our world today that no one will touch or even acknowledge. And ignoring them, regardless of how repugnant they may seem is something we do at our long-term peril. Think: Eugenics, over-population, fundamentalism, our enslavement by our biological imperatives…[add more at will].
I’m not sure about the emergency lasting forever. You may be thinking of an earlier post in which I discussed the fact that if humanity drives itself back to the stone-age, it may not be able to rise again because all the ores and such that were easily available as we worked our way through the first bronze and iron ages, will be long gone and accessible only in deep mines that presuppose advanced technology to access them. A catch-22 of our own devising.
But, from the POV of the biosphere and its eventual recovery, I don’t see the planet remaining damaged forever. Mankind and the blot it makes will, in the scale of millions of years, just be a small passing phase.