Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

UK schools are dropping teaching the Holocaust

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

– This is utterly amazing. If the holocaust happened, and I believe it did, then why should anyone fear to teach it? But, in the UK, teachers are choosing to not teach about it to avoid offending Muslim students who’ve been taught otherwise. Amazing.

——————————————-

Story #1:

Story #2:

16Apr07 follow up from Snopes, the urban legend people:

– By the way, before I published this piece orginally, I checked with Snopes to see if it was bogus and found nothing.   As you’ll see, if you follow the new Snopes link, it is only partially true.

070410 – Tuesday – A great example of local activism

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

I’ve added a new website, G.R.I.T., to the list of websites that I like and support on this Blog. You will find the list of these websites along the right side of your browser screen if you scroll down.

G.R.I.T. stands for Governmental Responsibility, Integrity and Truth. It is a website focused on issues having to do with local government here in the Western Washington Sky Valley area.

For those of you who follow this Blog from a distance, this may seem to be of remote interest but I encourage you to have a look. Local governments in any and all parts of the world could be much improved if their local citizens focused on and tracked the behavior, decisions and rational of their elected representatives with the same fervor and passion that these folks do. I guarantee you that very little happens in the town of Sultan, Washington, that is not closely examined, discussed and debated thanks to these people and the entire area is much the better for it.

Latest report from the IPCC folks

Saturday, April 7th, 2007

If you follow discussions on Global Climate Change, you’d have to be living under a rock to not know that the IPCC released its latest sub-report on Friday, April 6th.

There are three sub-reports scheduled this year and, jointly, they make up the 4th Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report.

The first sub-report this year concluded with 90% certainty that human activities are causing the rise in global atmospheric temperatures. This 2nd sub-report of the year focuses on the consequences of the warming that’s in progress – and the news is not good.

Bloggers and news organizations have been all over this story for a week working on early leaked documents, final draft documents and final release documents. It’s been a free-for-all and I’m not sure that I can add a lot to the conversation so I’m just going to link to some of the more interesting on-line articles I’ve seen on this topic. Below are links to various stories I’ve found on the web about this latest IPCC report along with a brief note about each link.

– This is a brief history of the IPCC reports in general. It discusses their purpose and the various versions that have been released to date.

– This is a summary in Scientific American about the most recent sub-report.

– This is an opinion piece in the New York Times discussing whether or not grim news like this might finally serve to break President Bush out of his long-standing denial of the problem. (See note at the bottom about the NY Times)

– This is the final draft as the scientists wanted it. But, at the eleventh hour, several governments lobbied to water certain sections down to better align things with their ‘political’ views of reality.

– This is another piece from this NY Times – this time from their environmental section discussing the findings of the sub-report in general. (See note at the bottom about the NY Times)

– This piece is, itself, an aggregation of articles from other news sources. This is from Time Magazine’s Blog called The Ag.

– This is a piece from the Washington Post discussing how the IPCC sub-report was watered down by several governments over the objections of the scientists at the last moment.

– This is another piece from the environmental section of the New York Times. It discusses the consequences of Global Warming as outlined in the IPCC sub-report. (See note at the bottom about the NY Times)

– This is from National Geographic and it explores the consequences of the consequences described by the IPCC. I.e., that these changes may in turn spur extinctions, shortages and conflicts world wide.

– This article from CNN discusses the tension and anger that were palpable in the last hours, before the final version of this sub-report was issued, between the scientists and the governments lobbying to water the report down.

– This is a summary of the IPCC Summary for Policy Makers – Part I, II, & III.

That’s 11 articles. I could have gone on and gathered up another dozen without breaking a sweat. This story’s big and everyone is reporting on it, Blogging on it, analyzing it and rendering opinions about it. I didn’t go to see what the climate skeptics are saying but I’m sure they are churning out vast quantities of confusion and disinformation to deflect the sharp edges of this report.

Frankly, it amazes me that we still need to try and convince people that something is going on with global climate change. And, what amazes me more, is that humanity’s response to this problem has been so pitifully inadequate to date. And now President Bush is saying he thinks we’re doing enough at the same time other folks are saying that we’re way past being able to stop these changes, and now we just need to figure out the best way to cope with the unavoidable.

We’re in some serious doo-doo here, folks. If humanity survives this mess, then it would be interesting to read the history books two hundred years on (if we could be here) and read their opinions about the self-destructive stupidity of our age.

Note that there have been four IPPC reports since the series of reports were begun by the UN in 1990. The current, or fourth, IPCC report is broken into three parts which will be issued at different times over this year. I’ve taken to calling these three reports ‘sub-reports‘ to differ them from their aggregate form. After all, if we call the aggregates and the pieces all ‘reports’, it can get a bit confusing.

—————–

– Some of these articles are from the NY Times and they insist that folks have an ID and a PW in order to read their stuff. You can get these for free just by signing up. However, recently, a friend of mine suggested the website bugmenot.com :arrow: as an alternative to having to do these annoying sign ups. Check it out. Thx Bruce S. for the tip.

An American brain drain – in progress

Saturday, April 7th, 2007

This is a personal story because I know the people involved. But it is also a bigger story – a national story – because it is happening all over America.

A couple I know is moving to Britain soon. These are wonderful people who’ve added a tremendous amount to our community here. He’s a PhD Assistant Professor at a major local university and he’s also a brilliant up-and-coming young scientist who is rapidly becoming a ‘name’ in the field he’s decided to work in. He’s been in the pre-tenure publish or perish portion of his academic career now for sometime working hard and waiting to advance.

Well, a university in Britain offered him one and a half times his current salary and an immediate advance into a fully tenured position as an associate professor. His new university has decided, with the blessing of the British government, to become a major force in global environmental science and has lavished 8 million pounds on his new department. The physical research facilities he will have at his control are several times larger than what he was allocated here.

I know these folks hate to leave what they’ve built here in the fifteen years they’ve lived in our community but how could they resist an offer like that?

The National Science Foundation’s budget is being lowered year by year and all over America, scientists of all flavors are rethinking their options. Other countries haven’t been infected with our country’s current disrespect for science. They are still well aware that science IS the power card to the future while we are slipping deeper and deeper into fundamentalist conservative right-wing dreams and delusions that science is an impediment to the advance of capitalistic profit and fundamentalist religious fervor.

Do I sound bitter about all of this? I am. This country was one of the finest experiments ever manifested in human history and we are in big danger now of pissing it all away.

Years ago I read a book, Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey, by a Nobel prize winner in literature, V.S. Naipaul, in which the author traveled the full arc of the Muslim world from Morocco to Indonesia. Many things stuck with me from the book but one that really amazed me was his description of how the authors of scientific papers in Pakistan would put titles on their papers like “The Electron Potentials of Scandium Ferrous alloys as revealed by the Grace of Allah“. I thought to myself at the time that these people have fatally mixed up religion and science.

Well, if things keep on as they are in this country, I fully expect to see papers like “Advances in GSM Cell Phone Technology as approved by the Southern Baptist Convention of 2010” soon. And it is deeply scary that there is a significant portion of our population that thinks changes like this are appropriate in this day and age.

Soon, those who think that science is just an inconvenience in their path as they try to make America a fundamentalist Christian nation and those who think that our societies only exist as sandboxes in which corporations are free to corner all of the nation and world’s wealth for the few – soon these folks will have marginalized this great country and another great event in human history will have had its day in the sun and be moved into the historical also-ran category.

Our scientists are leaving for Singapore, Britain, France and a host of other places and we are the poorer everyday for this brain-drain.

I will miss my friends soon. And all of us, in not too many years, will miss what this great country once was if we continue to embrace mediocrity.

/rant off

Bush Administration Moves To Gut Endangered Species Act

Sunday, April 1st, 2007

A secret draft of regulations (pdf) that would fundamentally rewrite the Endangered Species Act was leaked to two environmental organizations, which provided them to the press Tuesday. An article in Salon quotes Earthjustice attorney Jan Hasselman saying, “The proposed changes fundamentally gut the intent of the Endangered Species Act.”

The changes are fiercely technical and complicated, but make future listings extremely difficult, redefine key concepts to the detriment of protected species, virtually hand over administration of the act to hostile states, and severely restrict habitat protections.

Many of the changes — lifted from unsuccessful legislative proposals from then-Senator (now Interior Secretary) Dirk Kempthorne and the recently defeated congressman Richard Pombo — are reactions to policies and practices established as a result of litigation filed by environmental organizations including Earthjustice.

“After the failure of these legislative proposals in the last Congress, the Bush administration has opted to gut the Endangered Species Act through the only avenue left open: administrative regulations,” said Hasselman. “This end-run around the will of Congress and the American people will not succeed.”

More…

New Drive Afoot to Pass Equal Rights Amendment

Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Federal and state lawmakers have launched a new drive to pass the Equal Rights Amendment, reviving a feminist goal that faltered a quarter-century ago when the measure did not gain the approval of three-quarters of the state legislatures.

The amendment, which came three states short of enactment in 1982, has been introduced in five state legislatures since January. Yesterday, House and Senate Democrats reintroduced the measure under a new name — the Women’s Equality Amendment — and vowed to bring it to a vote in both chambers by the end of the session.

The renewed push to pass the ERA, which passed the House and Senate overwhelmingly in 1972 and was ratified by 35 states before skidding to a halt, highlights liberals’ renewed sense of power since November’s midterm elections. From Capitol Hill to Arkansas, legislators said they are seizing a political opportunity to enshrine women’s rights in the Constitution.

“Elections have consequences, and isn’t it true those consequences are good right now?” Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) asked a mostly female crowd yesterday at a news conference, as the audience cheered. “We are turning this country around, bit by bit, to put it in a more progressive direction.”

The amendment consists of 52 words and has one key line: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” That sentence would subject legal claims of gender discrimination to the same strict scrutiny given by courts to allegations of racial discrimination.

More…

My National Security Letter Gag Order

Monday, March 26th, 2007

– This story comes from The Washington Post.

———————————————–

It is the policy of The Washington Post not to publish anonymous pieces. In this case, an exception has been made because the author — who would have preferred to be named — is legally prohibited from disclosing his or her identity in connection with receipt of a national security letter. The Post confirmed the legitimacy of this submission by verifying it with the author’s attorney and by reviewing publicly available court documents.

The Justice Department’s inspector general revealed on March 9 that the FBI has been systematically abusing one of the most controversial provisions of the USA Patriot Act: the expanded power to issue “national security letters.” It no doubt surprised most Americans to learn that between 2003 and 2005 the FBI issued more than 140,000 specific demands under this provision — demands issued without a showing of probable cause or prior judicial approval — to obtain potentially sensitive information about U.S. citizens and residents. It did not, however, come as any surprise to me.

Three years ago, I received a national security letter (NSL) in my capacity as the president of a small Internet access and consulting business. The letter ordered me to provide sensitive information about one of my clients. There was no indication that a judge had reviewed or approved the letter, and it turned out that none had. The letter came with a gag provision that prohibited me from telling anyone, including my client, that the FBI was seeking this information. Based on the context of the demand — a context that the FBI still won’t let me discuss publicly — I suspected that the FBI was abusing its power and that the letter sought information to which the FBI was not entitled.

Rather than turn over the information, I contacted lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union, and in April 2004 I filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the NSL power. I never released the information the FBI sought, and last November the FBI decided that it no longer needs the information anyway. But the FBI still hasn’t abandoned the gag order that prevents me from disclosing my experience and concerns with the law or the national security letter that was served on my company. In fact, the government will return to court in the next few weeks to defend the gag orders that are imposed on recipients of these letters.

More…

B.C. premier stuns critics with plans to go green

Tuesday, March 20th, 2007

VANCOUVER, B.C. — The premier of British Columbia wanted to bring coal-burning plants and offshore oil rigs to this lush province, so environmental groups were ready for a fight as he prepared his government’s annual policy speech last month.

They were stunned when Premier Gordon Campbell delivered a list of green promises that surpassed their most ambitious dreams.

He would not only stop the growth in greenhouse gases in the province, he said, but also slash them by one-third. He would gut the coal-plant plans. Embrace wind power. Lease hybrid cars for the government. Squelch environmental pollution by the powerful oil and gas industry. Toughen car-emission regulations.

His plans would make British Columbia what The Globe and Mail newspaper called “the continent’s greenest spot.” Campbell also proposed an enterprising alliance with California to create a Pacific Coast bloc of states and provinces to tackle climate change without waiting for action from their federal governments.

More…

Australia: Government to subsidise rural broadband

Friday, March 9th, 2007

– this just in from New Zealand…

—————————————

Australia has adopted what looks to be a sensible way of ensuring that everyone can get access to broadband – the Australian broadband guarantee. It’s aimed at rural users, and includes private citizens and small businesses.

It works like this: if you can’t find a broadband supplier to a reasonable price and quality where you live, you can apply for a subsidised service. Then, one of a pool of ISPs who the government has signed up, will provide service to you at a reasonable price to you and at a quality the government has stipulated, with the government picking up the difference in cost as a subsidy. The government notes that the service may be delivered by satellite or wire depending on what is practical in each case, but the citizen or small business pays the same. The scheme gets going from this April. It sounds simple and should help Australians living in rural areas get a good standard of service, at least as good as those who live in Australian cities do.

The government has allocated A$165m to this, as part of a wider A$2billion investment in broadband. It’s a model New Zealand should be looking at hard, so that people who live outside our cities don’t miss out.

To the original post…

2006 Texas State Republican Party Platform

Friday, March 9th, 2007

– I heard that there are some amazing things embedded in the Texas State GOP Platform, so I downloaded a copy over the Internet and went for a read through it. Given that our country is currently deeply influenced, if not outright controlled, by republicans from Texas, this seems like reasonable knowledge to have.

– Here are some quotes I pulled straight out of the document. For the most part, I’ll leave it to you to draw your own conclusions – though I have highlighted things here and there. If the highlight is blue, I liked it. If it is red, I have my doubts about it (or I doubt that they are thinking about it the same way I am). And, finally, if I can’t resist making a comment, it’ll be in green.

– After I copied the paragraphs that interested me, below, and highlighted them, I was surprised at how many things in the Texas GOP’s platform I agreed with. But, not withstanding that observation, there were also many with which I thoroughly disagree.

– if you find this list tantlizing, I urge you to read the full document through for yourself and add your comments here.

——————————————-

Throughout the world people dare to dream of freedom, of opportunity, of a beautiful country in which to grow, to raise their family, to worship God in their own way without fear.

We believe that human life is sacred, created in the image of God. Life begins at the moment of fertilization and ends at the point of natural death.

We believe that traditional marriage is a legal and moral commitment between a natural man and a natural woman.

We further support the abolition of federal agencies involved in activities not originally intended to be delegated to the federal government under a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

Oppose the expansion of federal law-enforcement authority and the use of military personnel and equipment against American citizens.

Congress to immediately cut all foreign aid to any nation threatening our citizens and providing aid or comfort to terrorist organizations or providing arms to other nations hostile to the United States.

review and revision of those portions of the USA Patriot Act, and related executive and military orders and directives that erode constitutional rights and essential liberties of citizens.

We urge the U.S. Congress to call for a clear vote of the U.S. citizens of Puerto Rico to decide between statehood and independence, for the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico.

we oppose any attempt to introduce direct democracy (Initiative & Referendum) into our state constitution

We support a law that would require all sentences, paragraphs, sections, and any inclusion to legislation, continuing resolution, law or bill be germane to the title of the act.

We oppose passage of any international treaty that overrides United States sovereignty, including the Kyoto Agreement and the Biodiversity Treaty.

We oppose the Endangered Species Act.

We urge government management of public lands and resources be conducted based upon policies that prioritize human need over other considerations.

We oppose a mandatory national animal identification system.

We call for the Internal Revenue Code to be changed to allow a religious organization to address the vital issues of the day without fear of the organization losing its tax-exempt status.

We support legislation requiring labor unions to obtain the consent of the individual union member before that member’s dues can be used for political purposes.

We believe a candidate running for office should be required to actually reside within the geographical boundaries of the office sought.

prohibition of internet voting and any touch screen voting or other electronic voting which lacks a voter verifiable paper trail.

We support legislation to prohibit former legislators, government employees, and officials from acting as lobbyists for a foreign government and/or any business for a period of five years immediately after leaving public service.

Ten Commandments – We understand that the Ten Commandments are the basis of our basic freedoms and the cornerstone of our Western legal tradition. We therefore oppose any governmental action to restrict, prohibit, or remove public display of the Decalogue or other religious symbols.

We decry any unconstitutional act of judicial tyranny that would demand removal of the words “One Nation under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.

We oppose the recognition of and granting of benefits to people who represent themselves as domestic partners without being legally married.

We support legislation that would make it a felony to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple and for any civil official to perform a marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple.

We oppose the use of public revenues and/or facilities for abortion or abortion–related services. We support the elimination of public funding for organizations that advocate or support abortion. We urge the reversal of Roe v. Wade. We affirm our support for the appointment and election of judges at all levels of the judiciary who respect traditional family values and the sanctity of innocent human life.

We oppose legislation allowing the withholding of nutrition and hydration to the terminally ill or handicapped.

We oppose the sale, use, and dispensing of the “Morning After Pill

We unequivocally oppose the United States Senate ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which would transfer jurisdiction over parental rights and responsibilities to international bureaucracies.

We support welfare reforms designed to break the cycle of dependency by requiring welfare recipients to work, learn, or train in exchange for their benefits.

We strongly favor legislation recognizing legitimate alternative health care choices.

The Federal Government has no constitutional jurisdiction over education. We call for the abolition of the U. S. Department of Education and the prohibition of the transfer of any of its functions to any other federal agency.

To build strong and lasting relationships, we support the requirement that schools teaching sex education must teach directive abstinence until heterosexual marriage with an uninfected person as the only safe and healthy means of preventing sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancies among unwed students.

We support school subjects with emphasis on the Judeo-Christian principles upon which America was founded and which form the basis of America’s legal and its political and economic systems.

We demand the abolition of bilingual education as it currently exists in Texas.

We encourage legislation that prohibits the enrollment and education of children whose parents are unlawful residents in the United States. We do not believe there is any entitlement for these children to receive pre-school, elementary, secondary, or post-secondary educational services paid for by American taxpayers.

We support the objective teaching and equal treatment of scientific strengths and weaknesses of scientific theories, including Intelligent Design. We believe theories of life origins and environmental theories should be taught as scientific theory not scientific law; that social studies and other curriculum should not be based on any one theory.

We call upon Texas legislators to prohibit reproductive health care services, including counseling, referrals, and distribution of condoms and contraception through public schools.

We support the mandatory installation and use of seat belts and safety glass on school buses and any and all vehicles which transport children.

America is a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian principles. We affirm the constitutional right of all individuals to worship in the religion of their choice. (I’m confused – what exactly does this say?)

We pledge to exert our influence toward a return to the original intent of the First Amendment and dispel the myth of the separation of church and state.

We call on Congress to sanction any foreign government that persecutes its citizens for their religion.

We believe all law-abiding citizens should be free from government surveillance of their electronic communications except in cases directly involving national security. This includes any government mandate of trap door encryption standards.

We deplore all discrimination based on religion, race, color, national origin, gender, age or physical disablement.

We urge the immediate repeal of the Hate Crimes Law, which is unnecessary and unconstitutionally creates a special victims class.

We support imprisonment for life without parole for habitual felons.

No convicted criminal should be allowed to profit from the sale of rights to their story for books, movies, etc. while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation.

We believe that properly applied capital punishment is legitimate, is an effective deterrent, and should be swift and unencumbered.

We support full disclosure of all “on” and “off” budget spending. We demand that our federal legislators vote only for balanced budgets, and that the Social Security Fund never be used to balance the budget.

We also believe that all government contracts should be awarded by competitive bids.

We urge that the IRS be abolished and the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution be repealed.

The Republican Party of Texas is in favor of abolishing property taxes.

We oppose any taxation of the internet or internet services.

the foundation of our National Energy Strategy must be a competitive domestic oil and gas industry.

support technological development of environmentally safe uses of nuclear, coal and biomass for our national energy needs

promote all forms of domestic energy production including ANWAR, offshore California, and the East Coast, while minimizing environmental impact.

An individual should have the freedom to work in the job he/she desires without being forced to join or pay dues to any organization.

We believe the Minimum Wage Law should be repealed and that wages should be determined by the free market conditions prevalent in each individual market.

build a physical barrier along the entire length of our country’s border with Mexico, beginning with urban interface locations and appropriate monitoring

deploy the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (I.C.E.) within the U.S. to locate and secure all illegal aliens who have previously entered our country and expedite their return to their source country

We oppose the federalization and militarization of local police forces.

use random selection and terrorist profiling as a criteria for determining persons to be searched at U.S. airports

thoroughly inspect the contents of vehicles and containers coming across our borders using rapid and accurate technology.

not entering into any new arms control agreements with any nation that is not currently complying with previous agreements

systematic assimilation of legal immigrants into the American culture; baseline requirements for citizenship to include proficiency in the English language, study of American history and of the American form of government

development of a practical, limited, and temporary worker program that does not serve as an automatic path to citizenship

the cessation of the issuance of visas to individuals from foreign countries that sponsor terrorism

requiring naturalized citizens to renounce their native citizenship and surrender their foreign passport

We oppose illegal immigration, amnesty in any form, or legal status for illegal immigrants.

suspending automatic U.S. citizenship to children born to illegal immigrant parents

elimination of all laws requiring hospitals to give non-emergency medical care to illegal immigrants

the withholding of federal highway funds from any state that issues drivers licenses to illegal aliens

the disqualification of homosexuals from military service

health and disability benefits equal to active military for national guard and military reserves if injured while on active duty

the continuation of the all volunteer armed forces

We believe that the United States and Israel share a special long-standing relationship based on shared values, a mutual commitment to a republican form of government, and a strategic alliance that benefits both nations. … In summary, our policy is based on God’s biblical promise to bless those who bless Israel and curse those who curse Israel and we further invite other nations and organizations to enjoy the benefits of that promise.

we encourage the President to do whatever is necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring or developing atomic weapons.

We urge Congress to authorize fund expenditures and audit measures on research and development of alternative fuels to reduce the United States dependency on foreign oil producers and ensure no financial support of terrorist sponsoring nations.

We believe it is in the best interest of the citizens of the United States that we immediately rescind our membership in, as well as all financial and military contributions to, the United Nations.

unalterably oppose any agreement or treaty that seeks to establish an International Criminal Court (ICC)

We oppose … payment of any debt allegedly owed to the UN

We oppose … Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty

We urge Congress to evict the United Nations from the United States and eliminate any further participation.