Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

Poll: 70% of evangelicals see global warming threat

Saturday, August 5th, 2006

WorldNetDaily – February 16th, 2006

Majority of respondents want government to take action even if economy is harmed

A poll released today shows 70 percent of American evangelical Christians see global warming as a “serious threat” to the future of the planet.

Conducted by Ellison Research, the survey indicates a majority of evangelicals agree with 85 Christian leaders who signed an Evangelical Climate Initiative unveiled Feb. 8 that calls for government action to deal with so-called global warming. The initiative includes a campaign of newspaper, TV and radio ads.

Signers of the initiative include, among others, Rick Warren, pastor and author of “The Purpose Driven Life,” Rich Stearns, president of World Vision, Commissioner Todd Bassett, national commander of The Salvation Army, and David Neff, executive editor of Christianity Today.

More…

Evolution Opponents Lose Kansas Board Majority

Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006

By Ralph Blumenthal – NY Times – August 2nd, 2006

Kansas voters on Tuesday handed power back to moderates on the State Board of Education, setting the stage for a return of science teaching that broadly accepts the theory of evolution, according to preliminary election results.

With just 6 districts of 1,990 yet to report as of 8 a.m. Central time today, two conservatives — including incumbent Connie Morris, a former west Kansas teacher and author who had described evolution as “a nice bedtime story” — appear to have been defeated decisively by two moderates in the Republican primary elections.

More…

Reasonable Doubt – Spinoza redux

Sunday, July 30th, 2006

Ever since I began reading widely in college, the name, Spinoza, has been coming up among the ranks of significant thinkers in western history. So, I’ve known he was out there and that he was important but much more than that I couldn’t have told you until I read the following article by Rebecca Goldstein in the NY Times.

I probably always avoided delving into the man because such journeys into deep philosophy are generally taxing and may end up feeling unproductive after you’ve exerted the effort to see what the buzz was about and deciding it wasn’t worth the effort or it was impenetrable or whatever.

Well, in this case, I think I by passed an important figure out of laziness.

Spinoza, was excommunicated by the Jewish community of Amsterdam in 1656 at the age of 23 for making the assertion that no group or religion could rightly claim infallible knowledge of the Creator’s partiality to its beliefs and ways.

Think about that for a moment in the context of today’s world of fundamentalists – each claiming exclusive divine authorization and approval and each believing everyone else is wrong. The man was clearly ahead of his times and paid dearly for expressing his vision then.

Spinoza’s collected works belonged to both Thomas Jefferson and to John Locke and through them, his thoughts influenced the composition of one of the founding documents of the United States – The Declaration of Independence.

The following article is an easy read and it will place Spinoza’s thought in its proper context for you.

——————–

THURSDAY marked the 350th anniversary of the excommunication of the philosopher Baruch Spinoza from the Portuguese Jewish community of Amsterdam in which he had been raised.

Given the events of the last week, particularly those emanating from the Middle East, the Spinoza anniversary didn’t get a lot of attention. But it’s one worth remembering — in large measure because Spinoza’s life and thought have the power to illuminate the kind of events that at the moment seem so intractable and overwhelming.

The exact reasons for the excommunication of the 23-year-old Spinoza remain murky, but the reasons he came to be vilified throughout all of Europe are not. Spinoza argued that no group or religion could rightly claim infallible knowledge of the Creator’s partiality to its beliefs and ways. After the excommunication, he spent the rest of his life — he died in 1677 at the age of 44 — studying the varieties of religious intolerance. The conclusions he drew are still of dismaying relevance.

More…

Note:  to read articles on the NY Times website, you’ll need an ID and Password.  You can obtain these for free by going through their sign-up process once.

Faith, Reason, God and Other Imponderables

Tuesday, July 25th, 2006

As someone who sits astride the fence between science and religion, I found this article particularly interesting.   For me, I think that the physically manifest world is simply embedded within a larger spiritual existence and I have little trouble with the relationship between the two domains.  I find it fascinating to see how other people square their spiritual feelings with their lives in science.

By Cornelia Dean – NY Times

Nowadays, when legislation supporting promising scientific research falls to religious opposition, the forces of creationism press school districts to teach doctrine on a par with evolution and even the Big Bang is denounced as out-of-compliance with Bible-based calculations for the age of the earth, scientists have to be brave to talk about religion.

Not to denounce it, but to embrace it.

That is what Francis S. Collins, Owen Gingerich and Joan Roughgarden have done in new books, taking up one side of the stormy argument over whether faith in God can coexist with faith in the scientific method.

More…

Feeling Strains, Baptist Colleges Cut Church Ties

Friday, July 21st, 2006

David W. Key, director of Baptist Studies at the Candler School of Theology at Emory, put it more starkly. “The real underlying issue is that fundamentalism in the Southern Baptist form is incompatible with higher education,’’ Professor Key said. “In fundamentalism, you have all the truths. In education, you’re searching for truths.’’

The above quote was drawn from the article that follows. This split didn’t used to exist between the Baptist Universities and the the Baptist chruches (or perhaps it was better hidden), but as fundamentalism has gained a hold in this country, people are being force to make a choice between their faith and their education and that is surely a fine road back to the dark-ages.

GEORGETOWN, Ky. — The request seemed simple enough to the Rev. Hershael W. York, then the president of the Kentucky Baptist Convention. He asked Georgetown College, a small Baptist liberal arts institution here, to consider hiring for its religion department someone who would teach a literal interpretation of the Bible.

But to William H. Crouch Jr., the president of Georgetown, it was among the last straws in a struggle that had involved issues like who could be on the board of trustees and whether the college encouraged enough freedom of inquiry to qualify for a chapter of Phi Beta Kappa.

Dr. Crouch and his trustees decided it was time to end the college’s 63-year affiliation with the religious denomination. “From my point of view, it was about academic freedom,’’ Dr. Crouch said. “I sat for 25 years and watched my denomination become much more narrow and, in terms of education, much more interested in indoctrination.’’

More…

No regrets

Tuesday, July 18th, 2006

This is from an excellent blog named Life 2.0:

I think there are two principles that govern the course of our lives.

The first principle, and for most of us the default one, is one where we continuously   recreate our past. We recreate the past in the present by recalling it…. and the consequence of this is that our future becomes a reflection of our past.  When we harbour regrets we are simply reinforcing those aspects of our lives that we don’t like.

Everything that gets created gets created in the present moment…. the past and the future are just mental constructs – figments of our memory and imagination. But when we allow our present to be clouded by past memories this is the juice that is fueling our life.  When we allow ourselves to become hostage to our past thought patterns we might think we are OK and having fun, but we are about as free as lab. rats spinning in their wheels.

The second principle is  transcendence  – we can transcend the consequences we have put into motion. Cause and effect are suspended. Past actions do not become manifested in future outcomes. The past, no matter what it has been, is no longer a dynamic that must play itself out. Not only do we recognize the past is over, it is no longer at issue. We are able to re-create our lives anew.

More…

For The Christians

Thursday, July 6th, 2006

Thu Jul 6th, 2006 at 08:11:18 PDT

By now you are probably aware of what Jesus’ General is calling “The Indian River Pogrom”: as originally reported by Jews on First:

A large Delaware school district promoted Christianity so aggressively that a Jewish family felt it necessary to move to Wilmington, two hours away, because they feared retaliation for filing a lawsuit. The religion (if any) of a second family in the lawsuit is not known, because they’re suing as Jane and John Doe; they also fear retaliation. Both families are asking relief from “state-sponsored religion.”

Later, it came out that a group called Stop The ACLU published the address and phone number of this family in an effort to “expose ACLU plaintiffs.”

I am amazed and appalled that such a thing needs to be said, but what happened at Indian River is utterly against Christian belief and practice. The ministers of that area should be disgusted by what has come to pass. Instead, we read some pastors actually helped to lead the Christianist campaign that drove this family from their home.

Let us be clear, then. Using the resources of government to pressure neighbors into converting has no place in Christianity. Calling a twelve-year-old “Jewboy” has no place in Christianity. Telling him to take off his yarmulke when he comes to speak at the School Board meeting has no place in Christianity.

More…

“Watson, come here, I want you,”

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

Famous words spoken by Alexander Graham Bell in 1875 as he tested the first telephone.

Watson made everything in Bell’s lab. Bell found him in an electrical workshop in Massachusetts. He was a handy young man, but uneducated. After his famous invention, Bell went to England and lost interest, but Watson was at the center of myriad inventions of the young telephone industry. (Starting with, “how do I let somebody know they have a phone call?”)

The following is from Exploring Life by Thomas A. Watson, 1926. A friend of mine sent me the above text as well as the quote, below. I had to laugh when I read it because it reminds me so much of what I read today about religious conservatives and their reactions to evolutionary theory.

I shall not describe and comment on all we saw and learned in Egypt. It would merely repeat what has been often told before. . . .
I had been interested in comparing the desert sands with the beach sand I had often studied under the microscope at home. The grains of beach sand are usually angular for, although they may have been churned against each other by the waves for many years since they were set free from the parent ledges; yet, as each grain is protected by a thin film of water that acts as a cushion, its corners are not worn off. But, as the wind-blown sand has no film of water on its grains to protect them from erosion, their clashing when they are rolled by the wind knocks off their corners and they soon become spherical or egg-shaped.
This fact was probably well known to geologists, but I discovered it for myself in Egypt at this time. I carried my discovery a step further by examining the grains of sand in the sandstones of the region to see if I could determine whether they had been windblown in a desert or wave-washed on a beach before they were consolidated into the hard rock. To my delight, I found the grains in some of the sandstones were angular and in others, smoothly rounded. And I noticed that the latter kind of stones were often intricately crossbedded, which is also a characteristic of wind-blown sand. It was evident that some of the sandstones were of beach origin and that others had been formed under desert conditions.
With the enthusiasm of a discoverer, I was explaining this to a group of men and women who had gone with me to study the geology of the region about Thebes. An old Scotchman, who had joined our party, suddenly broke in with a dissertation on the wickedness of a man pretending to know more than the Bible. “When God created sand,” he said, “he created it just as he wanted it. If he wanted it coarse or fine, round or sharp, He made it so, for He knew man would need all kinds of sand.” . . .
I and the other students of Egyptian rocks went on to the next point of interest, leaving the man declaiming to a crowd of natives who did not understand a word. A native policeman, attracted by the man’s loud talk, came up to see if a riot was underway.
Research and text by LA – thx

Evolution’s Lonely Battle in a Georgia Classroom

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

It amazes me that in an age where virtually everything of significance that we use from TVs to electricity to computers to cell phones is the product of science and the scientific method, we still find ourselves defending scientific findings like evolution. This story about one teacher’s struggles in small town Georgia illustrate this quite nicely.

DAHLONEGA, Ga.

OCCASIONALLY, an educational battle will dominate national headlines. More commonly, the battling goes on locally, behind closed doors, handled so discreetly that even a teacher working a few classrooms away might not know. This was the case for Pat New, 62, a respected, veteran middle school science teacher, who, a year ago, quietly stood up for her right to teach evolution in this rural northern Georgia community, and prevailed.

She would not discuss the conflict while still teaching, because Ms. New wouldn’t let anything disrupt her classroom. But she has decided to retire, a year earlier than planned. “This evolution thing was a lot of stress,” she said. And a few weeks ago, on the very last day of her 29-year career, at 3:15, when Lumpkin County Middle School had emptied for the summer, and she had taken down her longest poster from Room D11A — the 15-billion-year timeline ranging from the Big Bang to the evolution of man — she recounted one teacher’s discreet battle.

More…

Research credit to John – thx

HR 2679 – The Public Expression of Religion Act

Friday, June 30th, 2006

How the GOP Summer Agenda Would Remove Penalties for Religious Freedom Violations

House Republicans have announced their legislative plan for the rest of the summer, leading up to the mid-term elections in November. Hidden in the “American Values Agenda,” amid the traditional fare is the “Public Expression of Religion Act (HR 2679).” The bill, which got a hearing in the House Constitution Subcommittee last week after the sexual harassment fiasco covered by every news outlet. This bill, would keep state and local governments from having to pay damages or attorney’s fees as a result of violating the Establishment Clause of the Constitution.

Think about that. Imagine your local government decides to teach a version of creationism in science class, or promote atheism in social studies, lead evangelistic prayers during official government meetings, or offer government grants for Christian conversion efforts. This bill would effectively remove your ability to hold the government accountable. And, to add insult to that injury to your religious liberty (…and it is your religious liberty. When the religious freedom of any of us is threatened, we are all threatened.), you as the plaintiff would be required to pay the massive legal fees it takes to bring such a lawsuit proving unconstitutional actions.

More…