Archive for the ‘Pollution’ Category

Ocean dead zone off Oregon dissipating

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

GRANTS PASS, Ore. – An ocean dead zone off Oregon that killed fish, crabs and sea worms in an area bigger than Rhode Island last summer lasted nearly three times longer than any of its predecessors before dissipating with autumn’s change in the weather, scientists said Monday.

This year’s dead zone off Oregon ran for 17 weeks, compared to the previous high of six weeks in 2004, and saw oxygen readings near zero that left the ocean bottom littered with dead crabs, sea stars and sea anemones. This is the fifth straight year the dead zone returned. It covered 70 miles of the central Oregon Coast and there are indications a dead zone also formed off southern Washington.

Southerly winds in recent weeks have flushed out the oxygen-depleted waters that were stuck along the Continental Shelf off the central Oregon Coast, and put an end to the condition known as ocean upwelling that triggered the dead zone, Jack Barth, professor of physical oceanography at Oregon State University, said from Corvallis.

“The fact that we’ve seen five in five years now, and this one in 2006 was the most devastating does not bode well for the future,” Jane Lubchenco, a professor of marine biology at OSU who served on the Pew Oceans Commission, said from Corvallis. “We’re seeing a system that is acting very sporadically. It’s changing in ways we haven’t seen before, or at least we haven’t documented before. We can trace all those changes to changes in the winds.”

A recent United Nations report listed 200 dead zones around the world, including one off the mouth of the Mississippi River in the Gulf of Mexico. Almost all of them are caused by fertilizer and pollution running down rivers to feed huge algae blooms, which die and decompose on the bottom, depleting the water of oxygen.

More…

research thx to MD

Pollution From Chinese Coal Casts a Global Shadow

Sunday, June 11th, 2006

Those who naively think recycling their garbage and driving a little less is going to help solve the world’s pollution and climate change problems haven’t the remotest idea how big and intractable the problems really are. Lester R. Brown in his book, Plan B – Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble :arrow: , said that nothing less than a reorganization of how we do things equivalent to the mobilization the U.S. underwent as we changed our economy over to a war-time footing at the outbreak of WWII, will be enough. And this ‘reorganization’ of how we do things needs to be global if it is to have a chance of succeeding. Contrast that with the foot dragging going on here in the U.S. with regard to even recognizing that there is a Global Climate Crisis. And contrast it with the likelihood that we can talk the billions in China and India into giving up their long held ambitions to live just like we do here in America. No, friends, if someone says things are desperate, they’re not exaggerating – not by half.

Unless China finds a way to clean up its coal plants and the thousands of factories that burn coal, pollution will soar both at home and abroad. The increase in global-warming gases from China’s coal use will probably exceed that for all industrialized countries combined over the next 25 years, surpassing by five times the reduction in such emissions that the Kyoto Protocol seeks.

(note: the NY TImes requires a signup to read its on-line version but it is free and painless)