BlueHost – a most excellent company!

April 26th, 2007

– The following is an E-mail I sent earlier today to Matt Heaton of BlueHost.com. This Samadhisoft Blog is hosted on BlueHost’s servers and in the year that I’ve been dealing with this company I have had nothing but admiration for how they do things.

– If, after reading this testamonial, you decide to check BlueHost out and perhaps signup, do me a favor and go to the BlueHost website using the small BlueHost ad you’ll find if you scroll down the right side of this page. On top of everything else they do that’s cool, they’ll credit me $65 if you sign up with them after accessing them through my ad. It’ll cost you nothing extra and I get $65 – now is that cool or what?

———————————————-

Matt,

I’ve never written one of these before. Frankly, when it comes to computers and the Internet, I’m long-in-the-tooth and fairly hard to please. But, I’ve been with BlueHost now for nearly a year and I am still extremely impressed at the value and the service I get for my $6.95/month.

Just now, I talked with two of your technical folks on two calls 15 minutes apart and they were both quick to take my call and both very clear and knowledgeable as they helped me. And this has been my experience on every single tech call since day one with BlueHost.

I find working with your company far and away the best experience I’ve had with any similar company and maybe with any company I’ve ever worked with in any domain.

My fear is that something this good just can’t last in today’s dog-eat-dog capitalistic free-for-all. I fear that if BlueHost is this good, some big fish like Google or Microsoft will come and gobble them up and then turn their value and quality into the same everything-for-maximum-profit-and-minimum-effort pabulum that most of the market is full of. In this nightmare, your tech support will go to India where script-drones will deaden its sharp edges into utter mediocrity. Calls to tech-support will go into long queues where the unfortunate will be forced to listen to inane advertisements for services they don’t want or need. And any small change to DNS servers or whatever will incur a transaction charge like the banks require for every small thing and God help you if you ask for anything that a non-technical individual operating within their script can’t noodle out. Your $6.95/mo price will be adjusted upwards in search for the sweet-spot of maximum profit which must reside just below the nearest competitor’s price-point.

I’m a bit cynical about some aspects of Capitalism. I don’t think that maxima of quality and value necessarily reside at the same location as the profit maxima. After all, the profit-centric idea of extracting the maximum of my money while serving me the minimum of service doesn’t exactly put me in mind of quality.

I don’t think that everything a corporation does should be judged by the single yardstick of what the investment returns are to the investors next quarter. I don’t think customer loyalty is something that should be distilled and optimized by legions of marketing psychologists working out how to dazzle and manipulate the unwise and the unaware subliminally.

In the past, some companies, IMHO, had a grip on the equations of quality and reputation. I’m thinking here of American Express and Hewlett-Packard. But, they both slipped under the waves beneath the guidance of profit-oriented marketing gurus. And look what’s become of Ted Turner’s CNN Headline News. It’s gone from being a national resource to becoming a Fox News clone with just a slightly different mini-skirt on. A lot of the malaise in the world and in America in particular is because of this ascendancy of the short term gains and goals over the long term consequences in all things.

But, I digress, so back to the point. In short, you are an utter phenomenon in the market and I can only hope you will last and endure. I’ve told a number of folks about your company and when I find myself describing everything one gets for the $6.95/mo., it sounds so unrealistic and over-the-top that I feel like most folks won’t believe me because it is all too good to be true.

You’ve got a very loyal customer here and I sincerely wish and hope that whatever vision of Capitalism and corporation building you subscribe to might get successfully propagated out into today’s markets which very badly need to hear it.

Feel free to use any and/or all of this testimonial as you like. I’m going to post this letter on my Blog as well.

With my very best wishes to you,

Dennis Gallagher

Antarctic Ice Streams Are No Bubbling Brook

April 25th, 2007

– A lot of good material comes out of the Climate Progress Blog.   Here’s another piece I found over there that is well worth passing on.

———————————————————–

Scientific and observational data from Antarctica are driving home the message that we have entered a period of consequences.

Most recently, scientists have discovered ice streams hiding bigger reservoirs of water in West Antarctica. The evidence has “major implications for glacial melt rates and associated sea-level rises“, and the rate of warming.

Equally frightening is that the ice streams feed into the Ross Ice Shelf, a major southern ice shelf whose melting would indicate “the end of the road” according to one scientist.

More…

Scientists feel climate report is too weak

April 25th, 2007

They take issue with how diplomats edited the latest warning on global warming and plan their own update.

BRUSSELS – Two distinctly different groups — data-driven scientists and nuanced offend-no-one diplomats — collided and then converged last week. At stake: a report on the future of the planet and the changes it faces with global warming.

An inside look at the last few hours of tense negotiations at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reveals how the diplomats won at the end thanks to persistence and deadlines. But scientists quietly note that they have the last say.

Diplomats from 115 countries and 52 scientists hashed out the most comprehensive and gloomiest warning yet about the possible effects of global warming, including increased flooding, hunger, drought, diseases and the extinction of species.

The 23-page summary certainly didn’t sound diplomatic. But it was too much so, scientists said.

In the past, scientists at these meetings felt that their warnings were conveyed, albeit slightly edited down. But several of them left Friday with the sense that they had lost control of their document. At one point, NASA’s Cynthia Rosenzweig filed a formal protest and left the building, only to return, make peace and talk in positive tones. Others talked about abandoning the process altogether.

“There was no split in the science — they were all mad,” said John Coequyt, who observed the closed-door negotiations for the environmental group Greenpeace.

The report doesn’t commit countries to action, like the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, but those involved agree that the science is accurate and that global warming is changing the planet and projected to get much worse.

Still, scientists have their fallback: a second summary that consists of 79 densely written, heavily footnoted pages.

The “technical summary,” which will eventually be released to the public but was obtained by the Associated Press, will not be edited by diplomats. The technical summary, Rosenzweig said, contains “the real facts.”

Some of its highlights, not included in the 23-page already-released summary:

• “More than one sixth of the world population live in glacier- or snowmelt-fed river basins and will be affected by decrease of water volume.” And depending on how much fossil fuels are burned in the future, “262-983 million people are likely to move into the water stressed-category” by 2050.

• Global warming could increase the number of hungry in the world in 2080 by anywhere between 140 million and 1 billion, depending on how much greenhouse gas is emitted over the next few decades.

• “Overall a 2- to 3-fold increase of population to be flooded is expected by 2080.”

• Malaria, diarrhea diseases, dengue fever, tick-borne diseases, heat-related deaths will all rise with global warming.

• In eastern North America, depending on fossil fuel emissions, smog will increase and there would be a 4.5 percent increase in smog-related deaths.

– Thx to the Climate Progress Blog for the link I traced to this story

– To the StarTribune article, itself:

Science & Cargo Cults, Global Warming, The Devil, and Democracy

April 25th, 2007

– This piece comes from the Talk to Action Blog which I’ve been following for some time. Their focus is, in their own words, “a platform for reporting on, learning about, and analyzing and discussing the religious right — and what to do about it.

– For the most part, I try to stay away from religion as a topic here unless the actions of religious people somehow relate to my primary theme, The Perfect Storm. Talk to Action ran a series of articles some months ago that I reported on however because the subject was so over-the-top I couldn’t resist. Those stories had to to with the Left Behind: Eternal Forces Christian video game. See these links:

– In the piece, below, Bruce Wilson of Talk to Action, discusses the current growing disrespect for science in America today and analyzes why it is happening. it makes for interesting reading.

———————————————————

Last October, I listened to United States Senator James Inhofe as he described, before an audience of perhaps one thousand people, his belief that Global Warming was a hoax foisted on Americans by a conspiracy to create a satanic one-world order….

n the end, faith in science is just that – faith. Have you ever seen a nuclear blast ? I haven’t, so how do we know nuclear weapons exist ? We take that on faith in the same way we assume that there’s a scientific reason our microwave ovens heat up our cups of coffee ; how do we know microwave ovens aren’t driven by magic, from elaborate incantations laid on microwave ovens at the factory in which they are made ? How do we know there’s a factory at all ?

Thousands of years ago, the Greek Skeptics demonstrated that it was impossible to really “prove” anything at all due to the facility of the human mind at generating alternative hypotheses for phenomenon. How do we know that there’s a world outside of our doors, really ? Can we prove we’re not brains in a vat ? How do we know we’re not living in The Matrix ? Or, how can we distinguish magical explanations for phenomenon from scientific explanations ? And, what happens to democracy when magical explanations, mystery cults in essence, supplant materialistic explanations of reality ? What does it mean when powerful politicians and religious leaders say scientific warnings about an alleged disaster of unprecedented scale bearing down on humanity and the Earth is really a satanic plot

20th Century Cargo cults believed that rich Western industrialized nations enjoyed a high level of material wealth from possessing special spells or magic that provided access to “cargo”, stuff that is. During the presidency of Lyndon Johnson one Pacific island nation where cargo cult belief was especially strong raised a sum of about $50,000 dollars as a bribe to offer president Johnson for the “secret of cargo”, the special magic that would conjure up cargo and so provide inhabitants of that nation the level of material prosperity enjoyed by Americans.

So, how do I know that “cargo” – consumer goods, the stuff of modern material existence – doesn’t simply pop into existence, conjured by magical spells ? Well, I don’t. I take it on faith. I could research the question by visiting factories where products get assembled and by traveling to mines and oilfields where raw material inputs for products get extracted from the Earth ; I don’t do that because I’m satisfied my explanation is “true”.

But, in the end, how am I different from a cargo cultist ? In the end I can only only give a qualified distinction – I believe in rational explanations rather than magical ones. And how can I demonstrate that my faith in a Heliocentric Solar System is better founded than the belief, by the Chalcedon Institute’s Martin Selbrede, in a Geocentric Solar System ?

In the end the Geocentric model assumes too much ; the theory is not parsimonious at all but posits that hundreds of years of scientific research and discovery, which has made possible such technological marvels as the computer I’m typing on now, nonetheless has gotten wrong a fundamental aspect of our reality. Geocentrism demands its adherents believe that centuries have passed and generations of scientists have been born and then died, yet it has only been in the past one or two decades that a tiny group of amateurs has uncovered the true nature of the Solar System.

I find that claim hard to accept because science is a highly competitive process and works in the end in ways not dissimilar to the way capitalist markets work. In science, better theories – which have more and wider explanatory force – arise in time to displace older theories which explain less. Individual scientists compete to generate the best theories and those who do attain status, favored teaching position, grants, awards, speaking engagements, and so on. Superstar scientists sometimes write bestselling books.

There is, in short, a competitive marketplace for ideas and so the claim that science has gotten the basic nature of the Solar System so wrong, and for so long, seems quite preposterous to me. It might be true, and computer laptops might be conjured, through magical incantations, out of thin air at a secret “cargo” factory inside a vast underground complex, run by aliens and nazis, hidden underneath the South Pole. Possibly. But that’s very unlikely.

More…

Taking Nature’s Cue For Cheaper Solar Power

April 25th, 2007

Science Daily Solar cell technology developed by Massey University’s Nanomaterials Research Centre will enable New Zealanders to generate electricity from sunlight at a 10th of the cost of current silicon-based photo-electric solar cells.

Dr Wayne Campbell and researchers in the centre have developed a range of coloured dyes for use in dye-sensitised solar cells.

The synthetic dyes are made from simple organic compounds closely related to those found in nature. The green dye Dr Campbell (pictured) is synthetic chlorophyll derived from the light-harvesting pigment plants use for photosynthesis.

Other dyes being tested in the cells are based on haemoglobin, the compound that give blood its colour.

Dr Campbell says that unlike the silicon-based solar cells currently on the market, the 10x10cm green demonstration cells generate enough electricity to run a small fan in low-light conditions – making them ideal for cloudy climates. The dyes can also be incorporated into tinted windows that trap to generate electricity.

He says the green solar cells are more environmentally friendly than silicon-based cells as they are made from titanium dioxide – a plentiful, renewable and non-toxic white mineral obtained from New Zealand’s black sand. Titanium dioxide is already used in consumer products such as toothpaste, white paints and cosmetics.

“The refining of pure silicon, although a very abundant mineral, is energy-hungry and very expensive. And whereas silicon cells need direct sunlight to operate efficiently, these cells will work efficiently in low diffuse light conditions,” Dr Campbell says.

“The expected cost is one 10th of the price of a silicon-based solar panel, making them more attractive and accessible to home-owners.”

More…

Australians warned of water cuts

April 24th, 2007

Australian PM John Howard has warned that irrigation of much of the nation’s farmland will be banned unless there is heavy rainfall in the next month.

Mr Howard said there would only be enough water in the huge Murray-Darling river system for drinking purposes.

He acknowledged that this would have a “potentially devastating” impact on many horticultural, crop and dairy industries around the river basin.

But he said there was no choice, and he described the situation as “grim”.

Irrigators are already warning that if they cannot water their land, there will be huge crop losses and Australian consumers will face large price rises.

More…

End of oil heralds climate pain

April 24th, 2007

Many people think that running out of oil, or “peak oil”, would be good for the climate. In his new book The Last Oil Shock, David Strahan begs to differ; he suggests it may bring catastrophe.

It is becoming increasingly clear that global oil production will soon go into terminal decline, with potentially devastating economic consequences.

Although the idea of peak oil has traditionally been ridiculed by the industry, now even some of the world’s most senior oilmen concede the case.

Last year Thierry Desmarest, chairman of Total, the world’s fourth largest oil company, declared that production would peak by around 2020.

He urged governments to find ways to suppress oil demand growth and put off the witching hour.

Other forecasters are convinced the peak date is even closer.

But many environmentalists continue to resist the idea.

Some seem to suspect that anybody who argues that oil production is set to fall must be a closet climate change denier with a secret agenda.

Others, like Stephen Tindale of Greenpeace, instinctively distrust forecasts of an imminent peak, but wish fervently that it would come soon.

“Let’s hope that the oil does run out”, he told me, “and that the world has to develop alternatives to oil seriously quickly, and from a climate point of view that would be an excellent outcome.”

Neither position could be more wrong.

More…

Organic lighting research burns bright

April 24th, 2007

The long, challenging technological march from the low-power light bulb Thomas Edison invented to the ultimate in a bright and energy-efficient lighting device may reach fruition in work led by the two ASU researchers.

A recent cover story in the journal Advanced Materials, a leading materials and device engineering research publication, details advances in the use of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) by Ghassan Jabbour and Jian Li, with help from graduate students Evan Williams and Kirsi Haavisto, a Fulbright scholar from Finland.

Jabbour is a professor and Li is an assistant professor in the new ASU School of Materials, which is jointly administered by the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering and the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. Jabbour also is director of optoelectronics research and development at the Flexible Display Center at ASU.

The two have developed an organic lighting device with “100 percent internal quantum efficiency” by employing newly designed host materials coupled with optimized device architecture.

Internal quantum efficiency involves the number of photons generated inside the device per each electron from the electricity source – such as a battery.

What’s particularly significant about the researchers’ work is that their optimized device adopts an even simpler structure than any yet reported by other research groups.

“There is no waste of electricity,” Jabbour says. “All the current you are putting into the device is being used to produce light. It’s the first time something like this has been demonstrated. Nobody else has shown a 100 percent internal quantum efficiency for lighting devices using a single molecular dopant to emit white light.”

More…

Yangtze pollution ‘irreversible’

April 23rd, 2007

Large parts of China’s longest river, the Yangtze, have been irreversibly polluted, state media quotes a report as saying.

Around one-tenth of the 6,200km-long river is in a “critical condition” and nearly 30% of major tributaries are seriously polluted, the report found.

Even a huge reservoir created by the Three Gorges Dam has become heavily polluted.

China’s environment has suffered as a result of the country’s economic boom.

The government has pledged to clean up the Yangtze, which supplies water to almost 200 cities along its banks and accounts for 35% of the country’s total fresh water resources.

But correspondents say attempts to clean up China’s polluted lakes and waterways have been thwarted by lax enforcement standards.

The first comprehensive study into the health of the Yangtze found that 600km of the river were in a critical condition.

Around 14bn tons of waste are believed to be dumped into the river each year.

The river’s aquatic life had been seriously affected, with the annual harvest of aquatic products falling from 427,000 tons in the 1950s to 100,000 tons in the 1990s, the report found.

A huge reservoir created by the Three Gorges Dam – the world’s largest hydro-power project – had also been seriously polluted with pesticides, fertilisers and sewage from passenger boats.

“The impact of human activities on the Yangtze water ecology is largely irreversible,” Yang Guishan, of the Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, which helped compile the report, said.

“It’s a pressing job to regulate such activities in all the Yangtze drainage areas and promote harmonious development of man and nature.”

The report said a comprehensive management system needed to be put in place to stop further parts of the river from becoming critically polluted.

Original:

Quantum Secrets of Photosynthesis Revealed

April 21st, 2007

– This is some amazing stuff. Folks at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab have done work that indicates that photosynthesis’ high efficiency is due to its use of quantum mechanical effects. It’s puzzled scientists of years how photosynthesis can operate with efficiency as high as 90% while their very best solar cells struggle to exceed 30%. Here’s a possible explanation and it’s a mind bender.

————————————————

BERKELEY, CA —Through photosynthesis, green plants and cyanobacteria are able to transfer sunlight energy to molecular reaction centers for conversion into chemical energy with nearly 100-percent efficiency. Speed is the key – the transfer of the solar energy takes place almost instantaneously so little energy is wasted as heat. How photosynthesis achieves this near instantaneous energy transfer is a long-standing mystery that may have finally been solved.A study led by researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University of California (UC) at Berkeley reports that the answer lies in quantum mechanical effects. Results of the study are presented in the April 12, 2007 issue of the journal Nature.

“We have obtained the first direct evidence that remarkably long-lived wavelike electronic quantum coherence plays an important part in energy transfer processes during photosynthesis,” said Graham Fleming, the principal investigator for the study. “This wavelike characteristic can explain the extreme efficiency of the energy transfer because it enables the system to simultaneously sample all the potential energy pathways and choose the most efficient one.”

More…